The team in charge of tracking Facebook’s (FB)
growth works on the second floor of Building 17. Most days, the offices
are like anywhere else at Facebook: whiteboards, toys on desks, shorts
and flip-flops, pretty low-key. Around noon on Sept. 14, the second
floor was packed. In one of the common areas, a giant screen showed the
number of active Facebook users worldwide. About 100 people, including
Mark Zuckerberg and his top lieutenants, watched the numbers run up by
about a thousand users per minute: 999,980,000 … 999,990,000 …
1,000,000,000. The counter paused for a moment when it rounded 10
digits, as if to emphasize the point: 1 billion users.
The
celebration was less exuberant than one might imagine given that
Facebook had just officially registered one-seventh of earth’s
population. Zuckerberg had thought about doing the whole
balloons-and-visit-from-Ryan-Seacrest thing when they located lucky user
No. 1,000,000,000. The problem, though, was that the occasion was
really more of a notional event, like when the United Nations announces
the world’s population. Facebook’s vast array of computers handles so
many users doing so many things, the best they can do is make a
statistical calculation. After a few minutes of hoots, high-fives, and
good cheer, Zuckerberg and his employees did what they usually do after
major achievements: They went back to work.“I don’t even know if we knew who the billionth person was,” Zuckerberg says about two weeks later. He’s sitting outside at the company’s sprawling Menlo Park (Calif.) campus, resting his arms on a tiny cafĂ© table. In his usual rapid-fire delivery, Facebook’s 28-year-old chief executive officer explains that his aversion to overt jubilance goes back to the earliest days of his company, when it was still a dorm room operation at Harvard. “We have this ethos where we want to be a culture of builders, right? We don’t want to overly celebrate any particular milestone,” he says. He knew even in college that a company would soon unite a huge portion of humanity via a single social service, he just wasn’t sure it would be his. “We were just these college students, and who were we to build this big thing?” he says. “Clearly, there were other companies used to building software at scale, and one of them would do it.”
Facebook got there first for a lot of reasons, many of them familiar to anyone who saw the movie The Social Network: Zuckerberg’s ambition, knack for addictive widgets, and what some would call supreme ruthlessness. The more impressive reasons, though, have to do with the culture he established, which is expressed in the motivational posters around the company’s offices: “Move Fast and Break Things.”
Facebook absorbed Silicon Valley’s hacker ethos and amplified it. Tech companies normally do controlled beta versions of their technologies; Facebook doesn’t beta anything. It runs as an unending series of quick, on-the-fly tests with actual customers. Engineers race to put up new features, see if they work, and make tweaks to fix them if they don’t. Even trainees who haven’t finished their six-week indoctrination program are asked to work on the live site. The live site, by the way, runs on custom-designed hardware and software housed in Facebook’s superefficient, and experimental, data centers. Every now and again the whole site crashes, but Zuckerberg can live with that. “The faster we learn, the better we’re going to get to the model of where we should be,” he says.
The learn-on-the-go philosophy regularly blows up in Zuckerberg’s face. He and his team periodically revamp Facebook’s privacy policy, triggering a predictable chain reaction: consumer outrage, company walkback, adjusted policy, re-release, lessened outrage, and so forth until the furor dies down. Unlike with computer algorithms that temporarily crash the system, however, these iterations are apt to leave lasting damage to Facebook’s reputation.
Then there’s the initial public offering, perhaps Facebook’s biggest face plant. The company set out to maximize its offering price and succeeded, raising $16 billion when it went public last May. Then it watched the stock sink from $38 a share all the way to less than $20, slicing its market value in half. The foundering stock price has hardened doubts about the strength of its business model, and may make it difficult for Facebook to retain talent. Regulators are looking at whether the banks underwriting the offering selectively shared information with top clients. Multiple plaintiff groups have filed suits in federal and state courts, alleging that Zuckerberg, Facebook, and its investment banks misled investors about the social network’s revenue outlook. Facebook says the suits lack merit.
“The
performance has obviously been disappointing. I mean, we care about all
the investors, and that’s really important,” Zuckerberg says. “I
suppose there could be short-term things that we could do, but we’re not
going to focus on those; we’re going to focus on the long-term stuff.”